WebHosting Paid by #1Payday.Loans
[00:32] SteffenP (i=steffen@p549970D2.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: "https://www.bomberclone.de" [01:05] BoS (n=BoS@dslb-084-059-200-205.pools.arcor-ip.net) left irc: Remote closed the connection [01:05] BoS (n=BoS@dslb-084-059-199-067.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #rocklinux. [01:49] kasc_ (n=kasc@dslb-084-060-118-075.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #rocklinux. [01:56] kasc (n=kasc@dslb-084-060-114-104.pools.arcor-ip.net) left irc: Read error: 110 (Connection timed out) [01:56] Nick change: kasc_ -> kasc [04:09] reinaldo (n=reinaldo@pc-14-24-104-200.cm.vtr.net) left irc: "Leaving" [08:13] <netrunner> moin [08:42] <blindcoder> moin [08:48] <netrunner> nessus is going closed source [08:48] <blindcoder> yeah [08:48] <blindcoder> old news [08:48] <blindcoder> olds :) [08:49] <netrunner> kopete somehow sucks. [08:50] Action: netrunner looking for alternative !gaim [08:50] <blindcoder> I'm satisfied with licq [08:52] <netrunner> blindcoder: as far as I can see it only supports icq? [08:52] <blindcoder> 13:45 to 14:30 [08:52] <blindcoder> yes, it does [08:54] <netrunner> yes it dows more or yes it does only support icq? [08:54] <netrunner> do you want tea of coffe? yes. [08:54] <netrunner> grml [08:55] <blindcoder> AFAIK it only supports icq [09:31] <daja77> kopete in kde 3.4.2 was quite ok [09:57] <blindcoder> daja77: the talk list is online [09:57] <blindcoder> I'm on at 13:45 [10:08] <netrunner> daja77: it misses jabber (fixing) and crashes with russian contacts and looses icq connection. [10:16] <daja77> I only use it for msn [11:06] <esden> wahh wahh wahh wahh!!! *sigh* [11:06] <esden> morning [11:06] <blindcoder> moin esden [11:06] <blindcoder> esden: what's up? [11:07] <esden> this is up: https://www.esden.net/blog/2005/10/03/pixelpost/ <- read the post if you have not yet and then the comment [11:08] <esden> she is right on the one hand on the other hand simply underinformed about her/his own softawer [11:09] <blindcoder> well, I just hope icculus doesn't find my rant about neverball :) [11:09] <esden> hehe ;) [11:10] <daja77> esden: don't yell at me [11:10] <esden> you must not critisize open source software ... they do it for free ... so they are not bound to any software quality guidelines [11:10] <esden> daja77: ?o_O? [11:10] <esden> daja77: I do not yell at you o_O [11:10] <daja77> 10:17 < daja77> I only use it for msn [11:10] <daja77> 11:07 < esden> wahh wahh wahh wahh!!! *sigh* [11:10] <blindcoder> esden: yeah, include that reply when you post your patches to them :D [11:11] <esden> hehe ;) [11:11] <daja77> wtf is ahmed hussein and why is he fullquoting messages without add a message [11:11] <blindcoder> no idea [11:14] netrunner (n=andreas@anvame.net) left irc: Remote closed the connection [11:15] netrunner (n=andreas@anvame.net) joined #rocklinux. [11:21] <blindcoder> lunchtime [11:23] <daja77> hm breakfast ... [11:51] Action: netrunner packing out banana [12:03] <blindcoder> re [12:08] Action: netrunner being bashed for sodomi in $otherchannel :( [12:08] <blindcoder> o_O [12:09] <netrunner> maybe I chose the wrong words to explain my first experiences of sleeping with a cat on the weekend. [12:10] <daja77> hehe [12:23] <esden> wow ... that is a big e-mail I produced here ... [12:30] <blindcoder> o_O [12:31] <blindcoder> okay, documentation updated for LVP 0.5.0 [12:34] <blindcoder> no more kernel patching necessary :) [12:35] <daja77> hm a new target ... [12:35] <blindcoder> new target? [12:37] <daja77> guess I'd need one for the zaurus [12:38] <blindcoder> thinking of paranoia, I remember a fellow kendoka even pays his membership in cash because he doesn't want everyone and their dog to know from it being reported on his bank account [12:39] <daja77> what membership? [12:39] <blindcoder> for the Kokugikan e.V. [12:39] <blindcoder> the kendo/iaido/judo club he's in [12:40] <blindcoder> he also asked t-mobile if he can pay his bill in cash [12:40] <daja77> O_o [12:40] <daja77> and they said no? [12:40] <blindcoder> he's paranoid [12:41] <blindcoder> and he's net even a geek :) [12:41] <daja77> hehe [12:41] <blindcoder> well, no, but he didn't give them a "Einzugsermaechtigung" [12:41] <daja77> that's ok [12:41] <blindcoder> so he goes to the t-punkt with his bill everytime :) [12:41] <daja77> hrhr [12:47] Action: netrunner also prefers not to give direct debit authorisation to certain institutions [12:51] <blindcoder> for example? [12:56] <netrunner> T-Com [12:57] <blindcoder> heh [12:57] <blindcoder> no more t-com for me [12:57] <blindcoder> only t-mobile [13:06] <esden> I am really eager to see what Connie answers ;) [13:06] <blindcoder> hehe [13:06] <esden> read [13:06] <blindcoder> can I see the mail? [13:06] <esden> I wrote a monster mail! [13:06] <esden> sure [13:06] <blindcoder> where? [13:07] <esden> I send it to scavenger [13:07] <esden> is that ok? [13:07] <blindcoder> sure [13:07] <esden> it is in german ... I have to translate and modify for their forum and for my blog [13:08] <blindcoder> heh, now I see it [13:08] <blindcoder> https://forum.pixelpost.org/showthread.php?p=15994 [13:08] <esden> mail forwarded to you [13:08] <blindcoder> thanks :) [13:09] <esden> ups it is encoded [13:09] <esden> sorry ... mail does it automatically :/ [13:09] <blindcoder> doesn't matter [13:10] <esden> ok [13:13] <esden> tell me what you think blindcoder when you are ready reading [13:14] <blindcoder> heh, nice mail [13:14] <blindcoder> guess I couldn't have sent such a calm response [13:14] <esden> I know :) [13:14] <esden> I slept over it and calmed down ... that really helps ;) [13:14] <blindcoder> thanks for believing in me :P$ [13:15] <blindcoder> bah, I'd have been just as pissed the next day :P [13:15] <esden> blindcoder: hehe ... I know you too good ... and I like you the way you are ... sbtw [13:15] <blindcoder> HORAAY! \o/ [13:15] <blindcoder> guess I'll post a mail to mutt-users now [13:16] <esden> hehe ... do it ... give them a bashing which they have not known ;) [13:17] <esden> ok .. I have to leave ... now [13:17] <esden> cu [13:17] <blindcoder> bye [13:25] owl (n=owl@62.4.80.218) joined #rocklinux. [13:25] <owl> hi [13:28] <blindcoder> moin owl [13:33] <owl> hi blindy [13:42] <blindcoder> okay, now I need esden to send me another mail to test the solution [13:48] <netrunner> blindcoder: I bought a galaxy now. the heavy hunter thing. [13:51] <blindcoder> sweet [13:51] <blindcoder> netrunner: I remember9 I had the Demon milspec one [13:51] <esden> re [13:52] <blindcoder> wb esden [13:52] <blindcoder> esden: can you send me another mail? [13:52] <blindcoder> I got a wuergaround from mutt-susers list [13:53] <blindcoder> munging the headers from procmail >_< [13:57] <netrunner> blindcoder: without cargo? [13:59] <blindcoder> netrunner: no idea, I mostly used it for headhunting and protecting cargo ships [14:00] <blindcoder> it _is_ a flying weapon after all :) [14:01] <esden> ok ... one moment [14:03] <esden> humm ... it is not possible from here ... damn cisco vpn >_< [14:04] <blindcoder> o_O [14:04] <esden> ok ... done [14:04] <esden> sent through the local mail GW [14:05] <blindcoder> YAY [14:05] <blindcoder> works :) [14:09] <esden> good ;) [14:13] <blindcoder> although mutt insists that this way of sending PGP data is totally deprecated :P [14:14] <blindcoder> hmm [14:15] <blindcoder> if this continues I'll have to insists on being included in the "Credits" section of fisheye [14:15] <daja77> ? [14:15] <blindcoder> so far I've reported no less than 4 serious bugs in that software [14:15] <blindcoder> and they're only at -beta3 [14:17] <owl> fscked satanisten-pack *pukes* [14:19] <blindcoder> what now? [14:20] <owl> blindcoder: long story -> query? [14:21] <owl> at least i will go to a lawyer soon & contact the "rainbow-press" ... (computerbild) [14:22] <blindcoder> o_O [14:23] <owl> this is the only way... my NB is away since 22. august (about 1,5 month) - and will at least take another 4 weeks! [14:24] <blindcoder> ouch [14:24] Action: netrunner starts liking gotos [14:26] Action: blindcoder whacks netrunner with a broken label [14:30] <owl> yes. [14:31] <esden> blindcoder: yes give him more .. gimme also a broken label and I help you whacking netrunner [14:31] Action: netrunner blocks by doing a far jump somewhere else [14:32] <netrunner> hehe, now iterate behind me :) [14:32] Action: esden doing a 64bit far jump behind netrunner [14:32] Action: netrunner goingto yet another place [14:32] Action: blindcoder casts netrunner to void [14:32] Action: netrunner segfaults on blindcoder [14:33] Action: blindcoder coredumps on esden [14:33] <blindcoder> brb [14:33] <esden> bleah .. netrunner is dumping core on blindcoder [14:33] <esden> waaaahhhh [14:33] <owl> hi esden [14:33] Action: esden flattend by a core [14:33] Action: esden dinning out from the dump [14:34] <esden> blindcoder: you are disgusting [14:47] <blindcoder> thanks :) [15:01] <esden> ooook ... going home ... cu [15:04] <owl> bye esden [15:09] <blindcoder> *hoil* [15:09] <blindcoder> some people are so stupid that you have to wonder how they can remember to breathe regularly [15:09] <owl> blindcoder: satan called you? [15:10] <blindcoder> no, read an email >_< [15:10] <owl> blindcoder: you don't tell me news :) what did they do? [15:10] <blindcoder> well, someone asked about a suggestion for a router [15:10] <blindcoder> someone suggested him the WRT54G [15:10] <blindcoder> and the OP replied: No, thanks, that's one of the slow 11 MBit/s router. I want a 54 MBit/s router (802.11g) [15:11] <owl> O_O [15:11] <owl> https://www.idealo.de/preisvergleich/OffersOfProduct/60985.html <- this router? ;) [15:11] <blindcoder> Well, WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK THE "54" AND THE "G" IN "WRT54G" STAND FOR, ASS? [15:12] <owl> hihi :) [15:13] <blindcoder> yeah, that's the one [15:13] <owl> then he/she/it is even too dumb to ask google [15:13] <blindcoder> just that it has 4x RJ45 [15:15] <owl> ah, ok [15:37] menomc (n=amery@200.75.27.53) joined #rocklinux. [15:37] mnemoc (n=amery@200.75.27.12) left irc: Nick collision from services. [15:41] Nick change: menomc -> mnemoc [15:59] <daja77> https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/64755 :D [16:00] <blindcoder> hmm [16:00] <blindcoder> website hits on lvp just went through the roof [16:01] <blindcoder> hmm [16:01] <blindcoder> I really wonder if I should do a LVP workshop :) [16:01] <daja77> on clt? [16:01] <blindcoder> anywhere :) [16:02] Action: daja77 points blindcoder to the url above [16:02] <blindcoder> yeah, already read it [16:02] <daja77> :) [16:02] <blindcoder> but LVP doesn't exactly mix with debian day :) [16:03] <daja77> it doesn't have to [16:04] <blindcoder> true [16:09] <blindcoder> guess I should do more LVP releases [16:09] <blindcoder> I have made the gigantic sum of TWO releases this year :) [16:09] <daja77> hehe [16:09] <blindcoder> and almost 40 subscribers o_O [16:16] <blindcoder> YAY [16:16] <blindcoder> in 12 days LVP will celebrate its second birthday! [16:16] <netrunner> at least then it should reach level of being useful *ducknrun* [16:16] <blindcoder> netrunner: it is now [16:17] <blindcoder> netrunner: no need to patch anything anymore to use the encryption feature [16:17] Action: blindcoder had to contact archive.org to see when I released 0.1 :) [16:20] Action: netrunner thinking about which customers would want their videos to be encrypted... [16:20] <blindcoder> paranoid ones :) [16:20] <blindcoder> also, you don't _need_ to encrypt them [16:21] <blindcoder> and then you have a livecd that can play them on any peesee [16:21] <blindcoder> so you don't have to rely on someone else to have the necessary codecs installed [16:22] <netrunner> blindcoder: yes, but you have to ask the one pc used and set up for presentations to be shut down :) [16:22] <blindcoder> you can still play them with an installed video player [16:23] <blindcoder> given that it has the necessary coders [16:23] <blindcoder> codecs [16:24] kasal (i=kasal@ka23.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) joined #rocklinux. [16:27] kasal (i=kasal@ka23.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) left irc: Client Quit [16:27] kasal (i=kasal@ka23.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) joined #rocklinux. [16:29] <kasal> Hi, I placed a patch in packages/public/xpdf/, and it is not applied correctly. [16:30] <netrunner> kasal: can you define 'is not applied correctly' in more detail? [16:31] <kasal> ... yes, I wanted to type second sentence, but I got caught with another problem before I discovered the details. [16:31] <kasal> Sorry. Please wait another 10 sec. [16:32] <kasal> I think the problem is in build_this_package (in scripts/functions, of course): [16:32] <netrunner> kasal: no. [16:32] <kasal> it calls apply_patchfiles in the loop "for xsrctar in $xsourceballs; do" [16:33] <kasal> So in my case, where we have 2 tarballs (t1lib and xpdf), it tries to apply my patch after the t1lib tarball is unpacked, [16:33] <kasal> but before the xpdf tarball is unpacked. [16:33] blindcod1r (n=blindcod@dslb-084-059-046-133.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #rocklinux. [16:34] <kasal> And I guess that it would try to apply the patch again after the second tarball is applied. [16:34] <blindcod1r> kasal: what's the patches name? [16:34] <blindcod1r> kasal: and how was it diffed? [16:34] blindcoder (n=blindcod@dslb-084-059-051-151.pools.arcor-ip.net) left irc: Nick collision from services. [16:34] <netrunner> kasal: call the patch .diff, so it doesn't get applied automatically, then edit xpdf.conf and apply the patch in the section where t1lib is handeled. [16:34] Nick change: blindcod1r -> blindcoder [16:35] <kasal> My personal tiny patch. Starts with "--- ./xpdf-3.01/xpdf/pdftotext.cc", so that -p1 gives you xpdf-3.01/... [16:35] <blindcoder> xpdf is a bit special because it has multiple downloads [16:35] <blindcoder> call it foo.patch.t1lib [16:36] <kasal> ... no, I need patch.xpdf . [16:36] <blindcoder> see https://doc.rocklinux.org/wiki/PackageFilesReference where it says *.patch.<sourcetar> [16:36] <kasal> Yes, it was there before I made my personal upgrade to 3.01. [16:36] <blindcoder> ah, okay [16:37] <kasal> OK, this is solved, thank you very much. [16:37] <blindcoder> you're welcome :) [16:37] <kasal> While I'm here, I'd like to discuss pkgfork. [16:37] <blindcoder> go ahead [16:37] <kasal> First, it's about 1 month since I studied it. I hope there was no huge change since then. [16:38] <blindcoder> no [16:38] <blindcoder> hasn't changed recently [16:39] <kasal> My personal target for a "minimal black-box system" contains: config.in:pkgfilter awk -f target/extract/pkgsel.awk [16:39] <blindcoder> hmm [16:39] <blindcoder> better use $base/target [16:39] <kasal> The problem is that by the time this is executed, some packages are already forked, and some aren't yet forked. [16:40] <kasal> ? [16:40] <blindcoder> nevermind [16:40] <kasal> $base/target? what is it? [16:40] <blindcoder> $base is a variable that always points to the root of the rock-src directory [16:40] <blindcoder> so I suggest this: pkgfilter awk -f $base/target/extract/pkgsel.awk [16:40] <netrunner> kasal: you can read Documentation/Developers/PKG-BUILD_VARIABLES (or similar) [16:41] <kasal> ok, I inserted "$base/" [16:41] Action: kasal knows that there is plenty of things to read. [16:41] <blindcoder> kasal: I don't think it matters in your case, but it's a nice training to always do so :) [16:41] <blindcoder> now, with the package forking [16:42] Action: kasal also knows that some questions may sound silly, because I haven't read much of the docs. [16:42] <blindcoder> which are the packages not already forked?L [16:42] <kasal> ... but ROCK is a young project, so I think it's better to come and ask then to plan for reading, putting it off, ... [16:42] <kasal> ... and finally ending up with debian. :-( [16:43] Action: kasal is searching "which are the packages not already forked?" [16:43] <blindcoder> kasal: no, you said there are some packages already forked and some not forked [16:44] <blindcoder> what's the problem with that, sorry if I confused you :) [16:44] <kasal> gcc is not forked yet, [16:44] <kasal> [ not confused, I just have to spend some time between speaking, [16:45] <kasal> because it's some time since I discovered the problem, and I don't remember some details. ] [16:45] <blindcoder> ah, okay [16:45] <blindcoder> well, gcc only forks into the enabled gcc versions anyway [16:45] <kasal> gcc is not forked yet, because pkgfork is called in config-300.in, not prefork. [16:46] <blindcoder> true [16:46] <kasal> What's the problem: my pkgsel.awk reads in list of packages (similarly as in the router target) [16:46] <blindcoder> but you can control the gcc forks with the ROCKCFG_PKG_GCC_GCC{2,32,33,34,40,41} variables [16:46] <blindcoder> okay [16:47] karasz (n=chatzill@80.97.102.202) joined #rocklinux. [16:47] <kasal> the list contains "gcc" (not gcc=gccXY), but it contains bash=bash2. [16:47] <blindcoder> yes, because bash forks earlier [16:47] <kasal> I find this a bit annoying... [16:47] <kasal> BUT NOW [16:48] <kasal> for something completely different! [16:48] <blindcoder> okay :) [16:48] karasz (n=chatzill@80.97.102.202) left #rocklinux. [16:48] <kasal> I have a patch for package/base/bash: [16:48] <blindcoder> okay [16:49] <kasal> Index: package/base/bash/preconfig.in [16:49] <kasal> =================================================================== [16:49] <kasal> --- package/base/bash/preconfig.in (revision 6377) [16:49] <kasal> +++ package/base/bash/preconfig.in (working copy) [16:49] <kasal> @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ [16:49] <kasal> then [16:49] <kasal> if [ "$ROCKCFG_PKG_BASH_DEFAULT" == "bash2" ]; then [16:49] <kasal> pkgfork bash bash2 [16:49] <kasal> - pkgfork bash bash3 stages "-----5---9" [16:49] <kasal> + pkgfork bash bash3 stages "-----5---9" version 3.0 [16:49] <kasal> elif [ "$ROCKCFG_PKG_BASH_DEFAULT" == "bash3" ]; then [16:49] <kasal> pkgfork bash bash2 stages "-----5---9" [16:49] <kasal> - pkgfork bash bash3 [16:49] <kasal> + pkgfork bash bash3 version 3.0 [16:49] <blindcoder> URGS [16:49] <kasal> fi [16:49] <kasal> pkgremove bash [16:49] <kasal> fi [16:49] <kasal> Index: package/base/bash/pkgmapper.in [16:50] <kasal> =================================================================== [16:50] <kasal> --- package/base/bash/pkgmapper.in (revision 0) [16:50] <kasal> +++ package/base/bash/pkgmapper.in (revision 0) [16:50] <kasal> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ [16:50] <kasal> +case $pkg in [16:50] <kasal> + bash[23]) pkg=bash;; [16:50] <kasal> +esac [16:50] <kasal> -- I hope you don't mind tis long paste. [16:50] <kasal> Does "URGS" mean you mind it? [16:50] <daja77> in fact we do [16:50] <blindcoder> yes [16:50] <blindcoder> okay, first [16:50] <kasal> OK, so I apologize. [16:50] <blindcoder> pkg never contains bash[23] [16:50] <blindcoder> that's in xpxkg [16:51] <blindcoder> and the "version 3.0" after the package fork is also unnecessary [16:51] <blindcoder> since that is checked for in bash.desc [16:51] <blindcoder> see the lines "#if xpkg == bash2" and "#if xpkg == bash3" [16:52] <kasal> ... I apologize for the paste, but I didn't meant to submit the patch, I meant to discuss it, since I think it illustrates some flaws with the "pkgfork" design. [16:52] <kasal> But I won't paste again, I understand now. [16:52] <blindcoder> kasal: try to use a pastebin next time :) [16:53] <blindcoder> so, why do you think pkgfork is flawed? [16:53] <blindcoder> I don't get it ;) [16:53] <kasal> I don't know pastebin, let it be for now, before I have to hurry. [16:53] <kasal> we'll get to it. [16:53] <blindcoder> okay [16:54] <kasal> First: pkg vs. xpkg: I used package/base/bdb/pkgmapper.in as a template. [16:54] <kasal> But I think the fact that pkgmapper.in has to exist is a flaw. The information is redundant. [16:55] <blindcoder> I don't get this pkgmapper.in thingie in bdb either [16:55] <blindcoder> it _is_ redundant [16:55] <blindcoder> in fact, I don't use it for my pkgforks [16:55] <blindcoder> It _might_ be... [16:55] <blindcoder> let me try something [16:56] <blindcoder> ah, okay [16:56] <blindcoder> got it [16:56] <blindcoder> it's a kind of "backwards compatibility" [16:56] <blindcoder> so, with pkgforking [16:56] <blindcoder> you would have to type: [16:56] <kasal> ... I'll have to leave soon, so I'll end my part and run, we can then discuss it later. [16:56] <blindcoder> ./scripts/Build-Pkg bash=bash2 [16:56] <blindcoder> to get bash2 [16:56] <kasal> [I know this is not much polite, sorry...] [16:56] <blindcoder> but with the pkgmapper.in you can do [16:56] <blindcoder> ./scripts/Build-Pkg bash2 [16:56] <blindcoder> and it will be recognized [16:57] <blindcoder> okay, I need to lreave, too :) [16:57] <blindcoder> kendo training [16:57] <blindcoder> I'll be back around 20:30 - 21:00 [16:57] <kasal> ... I still think "version 3.0" is needed. [16:57] <blindcoder> remind me to write a rockdoc entry about the pkgmapper.in file [16:57] <kasal> ... No, I won't. I'll propose a more aggressive change to pkgfork. [16:57] <blindcoder> it might be, yes [16:58] <blindcoder> or that :) [16:58] <blindcoder> kasal: though I think that one would be better placed at the mailing list then [16:58] <kasal> without version 3.0, the version number in config/*/packages{,.txt} moght contain wrong ver number [16:58] <kasal> and it is then displayed to the user in script/Config [16:59] <blindcoder> ah, I see [16:59] <kasal> .... yeah, I planned to subscribe to the list and then mail there for ages. [16:59] <blindcoder> heh, okay :) [16:59] <blindcoder> anyway, I gotta leave or the highway will be jammed [16:59] <blindcoder> see you later! [17:00] <kasal> I know this wasn't the best way to present my ideas, but waiting for time to make it perfectly, I woudn't do it at all. [17:00] <kasal> see you! [17:00] <blindcoder> send it to the list or talk to me this evening [17:00] <kasal> So thanks to all for patience, even though [17:00] <blindcoder> both are fine :) [17:00] <blindcoder> you're welcome [17:00] <kasal> ... I'll talk or mail tomorrow. [17:06] kasal (i=kasal@ka23.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) left irc: "Leaving" [18:35] reinaldo (n=reinaldo@pc-14-24-104-200.cm.vtr.net) joined #rocklinux. [18:47] reinaldo (n=reinaldo@pc-14-24-104-200.cm.vtr.net) left irc: "Leaving" [18:56] <owl> re [19:40] <esden> re hi ho [19:45] <owl> wb esden [20:55] [raphael] (n=raphael@host-84-235-196-162.satlynx.net) joined #rocklinux. [20:55] <[raphael]> hi * [20:56] <[raphael]> where can I put my order for an AMD64 crystal build down? [21:01] <[raphael]> never mind, just joking [21:01] <[raphael]> but still, I'm wondering if anyone of you has an amd64 build host [21:06] <blindcoder> re [21:06] <blindcoder> not that I knw of [21:06] [raphael] (n=raphael@host-84-235-196-162.satlynx.net) left irc: "using sirc version 2.211+KSIRC/1.3.12" [21:29] SteffenP (i=steffen@p54996CD9.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #rocklinux. [21:40] <th> at least i've a powerfull athlon64 machine [21:42] <th> but never bootstrapped amd64 build there [22:04] <blindcoder> then it's about time :) [22:14] <th> you're right. it's all about TIME [22:15] <th> especially having time or dont [22:58] SteffenP (i=steffen@p54996CD9.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: "https://www.bomberclone.de" [23:18] <esden> wow I am sooooo goood ... jumparound [23:18] <esden> dadadadada [23:20] <mnemoc> o.o [23:20] <esden> hehe ... mnemoc I wrote an email ... and it did hit the soft spot ... I love it [23:22] <mnemoc> :) [00:00] --- Tue Oct 11 2005