Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:00:13PM +0100, Tobias Hintze wrote:
> besides that i think that the gap between 2.0-stable and 2.1 is too big
> for stabilizing by merging from 2.1 to 2.0 in one step. my idea is to
> split this into more steps. IMHO these steps should be called
> 2.{2,4,6,8}-stable.
>
> that would imply that we should rename the current trunk from 2.1 to
> something like 2.99, 3.x-dev, ...
<RFC>
what about simply renaming trunk to "TRUNK" - without any version number.
We can use the rev. number if we refer to any special trunk status..
</RFC>
yours,
- clifford
--
___ ___ _ ___ _ ___ _ _
| |_ _/ __| |_ __ _ _ __ __| | __| |_ | __| _| |_ _ _ _ _ ___| |
| |/ _ \__ \ ' \/ _` | '_ \/ -_) |/ -_) ' \| _| || | _| || | '_/ -_)_|
|_|\___/___/_||_\__,_| .__/\___|_|\___|_||_|_| \_,_|\__|\_,_|_| \___(_)
|_| To Shape Teh Future - TSTF
"Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use
regular expressions." Now they have two problems." - Jamie Zawinski.
_______________________________________________
rock-devel mailing list
https://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel