[rock-devel] results from a new custom config minimal build (gcc
raphael-langerhorst at gmx.at
Wed Mar 17 16:53:26 CET 2004
On Thursday 11 March 2004 14:23, Alejandro Mery wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:03:47PM +0100, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > at last... I've set up an ftp server. Also I tried(!) to build a custom
> > configuration for a PIII (my laptop, called "eagle").
> > I tried gcc 3.3.3 and linux26
> > configuration is generic, package selection: minimal + xfree + a few
> > custom packages
> ROCK 2.0.0 is not ready for a linux26-only builds due to header problems,
> there is a good amount of patches form 'fake' waiting on submaster
> http://www.rocklinux.net/submaster/smadm.cgi which can make your life a
> little happier.
> there are two approaches to this 2.6-headers issue, one fix kernel headers
> to make userspace packages use them without problems (this is what distros
> are doing) or fix all the packages which include something at linux/.
> good luck and thanks,
Well... the last days I continued my linux 2.6.4 + gcc 3.3.3 journey. I kind
of have every (sorely) needed package running except util-linux ... I even
have KDE and postgresql (both working!) with only 116 packages(!). Well, and
"mine" also still fails... but here you can see the (short) list anyway:
Error logs from eagle-2.0.1-x86-pentium3-32-generic-expert:
 982 base/util-linux  0 base/iproute2
 948 base/util-linux  241 base/alsa
 0 base/mine  0 x11/linux-drm
 22 x86/apmd  0 base/iproute2
 0 avm/noteedit
172 builds total, 163 completed fine, 9 with errors.
The build is based on svn 2581
What I'm missing is util-linux, and mine wouldn't be too bad of course. I used
a couple of patches from fake (THANKS Alejandro for the hints), although
util-linux still does not compile with my settings.
All above is just informational (I'll put everything relevant up on ftp after
I got util-linux going).
Has anyone a working util-linux with linux 2.6.4 and gcc 3.3.3? (no, the patch
from fake on sm is not enough, at least not the one I tried...:
0903014019880)? If not I'll try to get it running myself, but just wanted to
ask so we're not doing duplicate work.
More information about the rock-devel