On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 08:21, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> 08 Jun 2004 Miguel Bolanos <> wrote:
>
> > why must we have the ROCK-COPYRIGHT-NOTEs on every
> > single file in the src? Isn't it enough with
> > Documentation/COPYING?
>
> It's not enough IIRC, yet...

Hmm, I think it's enough as we generally do not distribute the single
files. Being part of a package the files fall under the COPYRIGHT of the
package (but IANAL).

> > I honestly believe that it should be removed, as part
> > of a cleanup work that in my opinion should be done in
> > rock.
/me agrees also

[snip]

> Many of the .patches are not written by ROCK developers,
> and I'm not sure our copyright may be placed in them.

Yes, there might be a problem as patches usually inherit the licence of
the file the patch is applied to (haven't seen one so far however).

George


_______________________________________________
rock-devel mailing list

https://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel